<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brush-off via Bug Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2009/09/24/brush-off-via-bug-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2009/09/24/brush-off-via-bug-report/</link>
	<description>distraction in action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:30:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: n8</title>
		<link>http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2009/09/24/brush-off-via-bug-report/comment-page-1/#comment-29816</link>
		<dc:creator>n8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n8gray.org/?p=182#comment-29816</guid>
		<description>Thanks Seth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Seth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2009/09/24/brush-off-via-bug-report/comment-page-1/#comment-29800</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n8gray.org/?p=182#comment-29800</guid>
		<description>If any readers have developer accounts, they too can file a bug on this issue as I&#039;ve done here:

http://openradar.appspot.com/7257190

I have heard that one way Apple prioritizes bugs is by number of duplicates, so if this issue is important to you it may well be worth the time it takes to report it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any readers have developer accounts, they too can file a bug on this issue as I&#8217;ve done here:</p>
<p><a href="http://openradar.appspot.com/7257190" rel="nofollow">http://openradar.appspot.com/7257190</a></p>
<p>I have heard that one way Apple prioritizes bugs is by number of duplicates, so if this issue is important to you it may well be worth the time it takes to report it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berend Hasselman</title>
		<link>http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2009/09/24/brush-off-via-bug-report/comment-page-1/#comment-29728</link>
		<dc:creator>Berend Hasselman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n8gray.org/?p=182#comment-29728</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not only annoying that Xcode (and by implication Apple) decided to hijack the source code QLooking. They didn&#039;t even mention anything during installation.
I agree that Apple&#039;s suggestion is idiotic even arrogant.

I want to decide which QL plugin to use; I&#039;ve been using yours for as long as it has been available and it bets the pants off the alternative.

It would be very easy for Apple to provide some sort of option to not use Xcode&#039;s source code quicklook plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not only annoying that Xcode (and by implication Apple) decided to hijack the source code QLooking. They didn&#8217;t even mention anything during installation.<br />
I agree that Apple&#8217;s suggestion is idiotic even arrogant.</p>
<p>I want to decide which QL plugin to use; I&#8217;ve been using yours for as long as it has been available and it bets the pants off the alternative.</p>
<p>It would be very easy for Apple to provide some sort of option to not use Xcode&#8217;s source code quicklook plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

